Up and Running Blog

July 2009

Several weeks ago, Tim Berry wrote a very interesting blog about respecting the meaning of words, and how difficult it can be when the parties in a conversation use the same words differently.

Tim was writing specifically about terms used in accounting and business planning when he wrote:

This problem of definitions drives some people crazy, and it makes me very uncomfortable. It’s not just trying to make trouble on my part. I seem old-fashioned and inflexible when I fall back on the more established, standard definitions of the words and phrases some people want to give their own special meaning to.

I couldn’t help relating this to my experience in customer service, where this comes up quite often. The most frequent scenario is when a customer calls and tells us they’re having problems with the business plan pro download. After troubleshooting for a few minutes, often we determine that they’re actually not downloading at all, but installing using a CD.

photo by flickr user timparkinson

Now, to the customer, the difference between the two is just semantics. They don’t care what we call the process. They just want the program on their computer, and we can call it installing, downloading, or hocus pocusing as long as they can start writing their plan when it’s done. It’s perfectly understandable: they don’t want a vocabulary lesson when they call us, they just want their software up and running.

But to the customer service or technical support representative, it’s not semantics at all. We need to know what the customer is actually trying to do before we can help them, because the solutions to downloading problems are quite different than the solutions to CD installations.

When we’re not speaking the same language, support is difficult. Or rather, when we are speaking the same language, but using its words to mean completely different things it’s like there are two different dialects being used. We’re sharing words but not necessarily definitions. Both sides have to acknowledge this in order to actually communicate effectively.

We’re truly not trying to be difficult when we ask you, the customer, a lot of questions. Or when we say “Oh, you don’t need an activation number, you’ve just lost your serial number.” Our intention is not to correct you, it’s to determine exactly what needs to be done and to assist you as efficiently as we can.

Because after all — your success is our success.

Jay Snider
Palo Alto Software

{ 3 comments }


Do what you love and the money will follow? That’s been true for me in my life. And within reason, at least, it might be for you, too. Watch the video. Let Guy Kawasaki explain. (And if you don’t see that here, then click here to go to the source.)

This three-minute reminder from Kawasaki is what we baby boomers would call “an oldie but goodie.”  I found it over the weekend on Stanford’s eCorner entrepreneurship video site–which is an excellent resource. It’s a collection of talks, broken conveniently into segments like this one. It’s from 1993 and, despite recession and a lot of changes, it’s holding up just fine to the ravages of time. It’s as valid today as it was then.

I do have that one reservation, however. I hope it’s obvious. If you take this idea too literally, and do what you love without any regard for what other people will pay for, then it doesn’t work. You need empathy and common sense. Love skiing? Teach it, make gear, do a store, build a website, do something related that people will pay for. Does that make sense?

{ 1 comment }


Very interesting piece on BusinessWeek.com today, “Is Entrepreneurship Declining.” John Tozzi gets two contrary points of view from two people I’m proud to know and admire: Scott Shane and Steve King. John picks up the right links:

Scott says yes and

Steve says no.

Both pieces are well-written and well-researched. William Blake said, in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, “anything possible to be believed is an image of truth.” I’ve always liked that quote.

Tozzie concludes:

I can’t argue with the entrepreneurship numbers. But as one of Scott’s commenters points out, you get different trend lines depending on where you start counting. I think there could be an inflection point around the beginning of this decade that reflects growth of new types of ventures. Curious to hear more thoughts on this in comments or on Twitter.

What do you think?

{ 1 comment }